Ford Focus RS Forum banner

Honda Civic Type R Black Edition review: Ford Focus RS who?

5.2K views 14 replies 13 participants last post by  Imped  
#1 ·

By Ben Griffin, 10th Apr 2017

The Good

Fierce performance
Precise handling
Sublime gearbox

The Bad

Loutish styling may be a turn-off
About to be replaced

Our rating:

The Honda Civic Type R Black Edition is a celebration of the end for the current model. We spent a week with it in a world now occupied by the Ford Focus RS and BMW M140i to see if it can still compete.

The invite for the new Honda Civic Type R launch just landed in the Recombu Cars inbox, which means it really is the end of the line for the FK2. A model that saw Honda go against tradition by introducing a turbocharged engine.

But rather than be all teary about its impending demise, Honda thought it would be better to go out with a bang. A bang known as the Honda Civic Type R Black Edition ─ here is our verdict after a week of motoring and whether it can stand up to the Ford Focus RS and other heavy-weight contenders.

Honda Civic Type R Black Edition review: What is it?

Imagine a Honda Civic Type R with a pitch black paint job and red accents on the ludicrous spoiler and around the bottom of the car. Bam ─ you got it. The aesthetics have changed but none of the mechanics.

That means the same 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo lives under the bonnet with the same 306bhp power output and 295lb/ft (400Nm) of torque, the same top speed of 167mph and the same 0-62mph time of 5.7 seconds.

Not that we are complaining because the Civic Type R never really made us pine for more power. The front wheels have a tough enough job as it is, especially in the rain.

The car is the same price as the Civic Type R GT it is based on, which means all the same goodies (dual zone climate control, parking sensors) but with added rarity as just 100 Black Editions exist.

At best it could go up in price, at worst you benefit from added desirability and exclusivity for the same money.

Honda Civic Type R Black Edition review: How does it handle?

A bit like a touring car. The Civic Type R Black Edition is brutal and loutish, with the beautifully stubby short-throw of the six-speed manual making it so easy to smash through the gears and build up ballistic pace.

The four-cylinder creates a harsh note that encourages you to thrash it all the way to 7,000rpm, as does the fact peak power comes in 500rpm before that. Those missing the VTECs of old soon learn to appreciate the honest brutality of the turbocharged 2.0-litre.

Though the Golf R and Focus RS both have power dished out to all four wheels, the Civic Type R can only rely on the front and a limited-slip differential. But that does nothing to stop it from being the most capable at going around a corner.

Ford never lapped the Focus RS around the Nurburgring and we would hazard a guess it had something to do with the Civic Type R, which managed a lap time of 7:50. That is four seconds faster than a Porsche 997 911 Turbo and two seconds faster than the Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4.

About fifteen seconds of driving the Civic Type R reveals why it is such a beast on track. The handling is razor sharp and it holds the line with extraordinary grip and balance. Body roll is never an issue and any moment of understeer is easily corrected.

On public roads the Type R manages to obliterate cars with far bigger price tags and it does so in such raw fashion you can only grin as you chuck it around. With a weight advantage of more than 150kg on the Focus RS, it is no wonder it feels more agile and has a higher cornering speed.

The suspension is more forgiving than brutal. It can shake your fillings out on a bad road, but it is by no means as annoyingly harsh as the Peugeot 208 GTi 270 or the Focus RS. Only the low ride height really ever prevents progress as quick as you want it to be.

Make no mistake, the Civic Type R Black Edition is a no-nonsense hatchback that can prove lethal in the right hands and deliciously fun even in the wrong ones. It is a precision tool with bags of personality and giant-topping credentials.

Honda Civic Type R Black Edition review: What about practicality?

Though it looks utterly bonkers, the Civic Type R Black Edition has a rather boring side to it. The boot is positively gigantic, at 498 litres, while the height of the car allows tall people to enjoy it without their head rubbing on the ceiling.

The leg room is almost as generous in the back, making it great for ferrying people around, while the glove box and central arm rest adds two more main storage areas for sweets and other travel essentials.

As for comfort, the front seats are soft enough for long journeys and the steering and seat adjustment lets you sit how you want and avoid enduring any obstruction of the funky dials.

Running costs are somewhat low. The combined figure of 38.7mpg is impressive and the real-world figure can be close if conditions allow, which is more than can be said of the thirsty Focus RS. CO2 comes in at 170g/km, only 7g/km more than an automatic M140i.

The infotainment system is a tad hit and miss, especially as we struggled to pair up a phone, but we have seen a lot worse and the navigation was able to get us from A to B without wanting us to tear out our hair.

Honda Civic Type R Black Edition review: Better than the Focus RS?

We never had the luxury of knowing what the Focus RS was like when we first drove the Civic Type R back in 2015. Then the hype machine built Ford's hot hatch into the second coming and almost everyone forgot about the Honda.

That is a crying shame because the Civic Type R Black Edition is the one you would reach for in a track setting because it is more predictable and controllable but, at the same time, considerably more exciting.

Even in a road setting, the Civic Type R narrowly gets our vote because of the way it brings a drive to life. The Focus RS needs more speed to enjoy than the Type R, which is a problem when most roads are congested misery-bringers.

In the wet we can see the all-wheel drive nature of the Focus RS coming into its own and off the line it would probably win, but the extra heft would put it at a serious disadvantage and the engine note is less interesting.

It is also worth pointing out the Civic Type R tries to rip itself apart in first and second, which makes it feel explosive once the turbo lag subsides, whereas the Focus RS sees torque restriction and is therefore more muted and less poised for attack.

Both are great cars, but the gift of hindsight has allowed us to see how truly great the Type R really is. If the 'hot' in 'hot hatch' means the most to you, the Honda is all the heat you will ever need.

Honda Civic Type R Black Edition review: Should I buy one, then?

We loved the Honda Civic Type R then and, having driven the BMW M140i, Audi RS3 and Focus RS, we love it now. It is a hooligan of a car that proves throwing power to the front wheels can, when done properly, still be effective.

The problem is that the Civic Type R has such a divisive look we are unsure if even Honda knows what to think of it. Our 17-year-old self would be humping the back of it, our more mature self worried it looks way too Fast & Furious.

But the stealthy black look you get with the ÂŁ32,300 Black Edition actually reduces some of the visual impact and in doing so it becomes more palatable. Maybe not everyone would notice you are driving a poor man's Batmobile?

In summary, the Civic Type R Black Edition is a blinder of a good bye to a car overshadowed, but never outgunned, by its more powerful competitors. For raw hatchback thrills, there is nothing better. At least, that is, until the new Civic arrives.

Key Specs

Engine:
2.0-litre four-cylinder turbocharged VTEC
Power:
306bhp at 6,500rpm
Torque:
295ft/lb (400Nm) at 2,500rpm
Acceleration:
0-62mph in 5.7 seconds
Emissions:
170g/km of CO2
Economy:
38.7mpg (combined)
Price:
ÂŁ32,300

https://recombu.com/cars/article/honda-civic-type-r-black-edition-review-2017
 
#3 ·
Honda showed 7:50 with a "development car." All we have for comparison is a different driver who reportedly also drove the Focus RS at 8:06 and 8:15 for the Type R.

Who the **** knows... and who the **** cares. Both these cars are quick, but I don't think it's outrageous to say that the RS is much more versatile and can drive in just about any condition out there. The Honda is likely to be much lighter than the Ford and I wouldn't be surprised if it's a 500 pound difference.
 
#4 ·
R is as ugly as I've ever seen. F&F car to me. But if it had their SH-AWD system, I'd have been all ears............FWD even with revoknuckle type setup is still gonna torque steer and won't feel as good in the turns.
 
#5 ·
It has a lot of things going for it as long as you could live with the look of it. I myself could not. Too bad because the Civic R is pretty much the same as the RS. This is the first time either has been available here. I always figured if one ever was sold here I would get one. Big disappointment.
 
#7 ·
The major downside I see about this car is that fact that it's FWD. I think FWD cars are really at their limit around 300-350 hp when it comes to balance and torque steer. I am sure Honda has appropriately vetted out the handling characteristics in stock form and do not doubt it handles well (Honda has knack for squeezing out great skid-pad numbers and slalom speeds with their Type R's). However, I don't believe there is much head-room to mod the car without disrupting its balance.

Having spent many years in an ITR and many track events with it, I love the Type R cars. The car handled well and was "perfectly" balanced for a FWD car (the power to weight ratio was fantastic); and the lift-throttle over-steer was a thing of beauty. The car did not need more horsepower and I can only see how it would've disrupted the handling dynamics.

The downside about the RS, as people have already mentioned, is that it is quite a heavy car. I think if it were to lose ~200 lbs it would be just perfect. The RS remains/feels more neutral through a turn and getting on the gas can actually cause the car to rotate. I don't think any FWD car can do this.
 
#9 ·
the Civic Type R, which managed a lap time of 7:50. That is four seconds faster than a Porsche 997 911 Turbo and two seconds faster than the Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4
Uh, yeah. I too have to throw a BS flag on this statement. The Type R is a fast car to be sure, but those cars are probably a second and a half quicker to 60 and 30+ faster on top end. On a 14 mile course, that's just nonsense. I don't care how much "FWD grip" there is.
 
#13 ·
Given up caring about any thread referring to the Nurburgring which has turned into little but a marketing term when spruiked by manufacturers using their own numbers. Type R is a damn good car, RS isn't a God and not for everyone. Choice is a wonderful thing. Hype is often a term aimed at RS. Nurburgring is a term used in exactly that context and in this case by the Honda marketing machine. Ford at least have had the decency to avoid a tainted fruit. A trend which hopefully becomes more common.